Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘libertarian lizard people’ Category

Yeah, how’s that working out in California’s Central Valley?

Turns out that California’s regulators that were supposed to keep oil companies from polluting people’s water wells wasn’t actually keeping track of all the deep injection wells that oil companies were using to dispose of their wastes. As a result, injection wells got drilled too close to people’s water supplies, and too shallow. And nobody knows the extent of the problem because most of these wells are undocumented, like the farm workers that Trump expelled.

So not only can’t the Central Valley harvest its crops, it can’t drink its water either. Yet the dumb motherfuckers still insist, day after day, that the reason they aren’t rolling in dough is because of “too much regulation”. Dumbasses just had their water filled with fuckin’ arsenic and cyanide and shit, for cryin’ out loud, and they *still* are Libertopians who insist “surely no business would ever do evil if unregulated.” Talk about stupid motherfuckers.

– Badtux the Not-Libertopian Penguin

Read Full Post »

Gregory Burleson gets sentenced for pointing a gun at Federal employees.

Sixty-eight years. And you have to serve at least 3/4ths of your sentence in Federal prisons, so he’s not going to get out until… well, he’s 53, so let’s just say “dead.”

Good.

– Badtux the Vicious Penguin

Read Full Post »

People with Type 1 diabetes are having to turn to the black market for the insulin they need to stay alive. This is especially true if they’re allergic to the particular bacterium genetically engineered to produce the specific brand of insulin that their insurer covers. The new genetically-engineered insulin was supposed to solve the allergy problem that faced some users of the pig or cow insulin because it’s people insulin, not pig insulin or cow insulin. Instead it created its own allergy problems because some of the proteins of the bacteria that produced the insulin end up in the insulin, and allergies happen due to those proteins, too.

And to top it all off, because these are genetically engineered insulins, the vendors raised the price to outrageous sums. Meanwhile, the cheap animal insulins are no longer available on the U.S. market — the only way to get cheap insulin now is to import it illegally on the black market from Canada.

The core problem here is that insurers and drug makers are quite willing to kill Americans suffering from Type 1 diabetes in order to increase their profits. If you suffer from Type 1 diabetes and don’t get your insulin when you need it, you *die*. But insurers and drug makers don’t care. They don’t have to. It’s not as if there was some entity called “government” that had the power to regulate them and force them to bring cheap animal insulin back on the market again, after all. This “government” thing? It must be imaginary, right?

Say hello to Libertopia, folks, where drug makers are quite happy to kill people for profit because they don’t care and they don’t have to.

– Badtux the Disgusted Penguin

Read Full Post »

Democracy is where 5,000,000 sheep and 4500 wolves decide what’s for dinner (note — the ratio of sheep to wolves is pretty much that worldwide, there’s a lot more sheep than wolves). The wolves end up eating a lot of grass.

Libertarianism is where each of those wolves decides for himself what’s for dinner. They eat a lot of mutton.

Clearly wolves prefer libertarianism to democracy. Which is why they spend so much time trying to tar democracy as somehow “wrong” or “evil” — it interferes with their mutton supply. And why they also spend so much time trying to convince sheep that they’re actually wolves. A lot of wanna-be wolves running around out there with hooves rather than paws, baaaa’ing rather than howling, thinking that if they vote for mutton for dinner, it’ll be someone else that gets eaten, not them.

In reality, of course, it doesn’t work that way.

Thus the epidemic of deaths of despair amongst less educated white people. They thought they were wolves. They voted for wolves. They were actually deluded sheep wearing a bad fake wolfskin. And now that they’re starving, they’re baaa’ing that it’s all the fault of demon liberal sheep who didn’t let them eat mutton.

– Badtux the Not-libertarian Penguin

Read Full Post »

A reminder: Peter Thiel is not a nice man, but he hasn’t had anything to do with PayPal for over 15 years now. He doesn’t even have any PayPal stock anymore. Now he makes his money ripping off startup company founders and investors, when he’s not funding lawsuits against newspapers and news magazines whose coverage displeases him in hopes of driving them out of business, or donating millions to Donald Trump’s campaign.

In short, disgust with Peter Thiel over the many evil things he has said and done, evil things such as attacking the 1st Amendment with huge piles of cash and supporting an out-and-out bigot, is no reason to close your PayPal account. Because Peter Thiel has nothing to do with PayPal. He sold all his shares to eBay in 2002. In fact, the only company he owns any stock in that you might actually use and boycott is Facebook, where he owns around 1% of the company after selling off most of his shares. Which probably isn’t enough to make it worth boycotting Facebook, because Thiel would just shrug and say “So?”. His share of Facebook now is less than 1% of his total wealth. Peanuts. He sneers at mere mortals like you and I, because he is an uberman and we are mere untermenschen before his Libertarian magnificence.

Yet despite his Libertarian magnificence, he still needed the State’s courts to take down Gawker. Typical, eh?

– Badtux the Helpful Penguin

Read Full Post »

So, a Libertarian asked “why does the government require me to get a dog license and vaccinate my dog, anyhow? That’s big government overreach!”

Is it? Hmm. So the question is, why is there a requirement in 47 states and the District of Columbia that dogs be vaccinated, anyhow? Quite clearly it’s a vast Big Brother conspiracy in all 47 of those states to penalize dog owners, a law passed simply because they could pass a law, right?

Uhm, well…. no. Not exactly. Rabies kills thousands per year in nations where dogs are not vaccinated. It’s a very horrific death, and 99% fatal once symptoms start. It kills half a dozen per year in the US, mostly due to bat bites. The problem with dogs and rabies is that dogs can bite not only you and spread rabies to you, but they can spread rabies to your friends, relatives, children, etc. also. You might have the right to risk yourself getting rabies. But you have no right to risk those other people getting rabies from your unvaccinated dog.

So those other people at risk of getting rabies from your unvaccinated dog got together and passed a law to force you to vaccinate your dog. Because you have a right to be as rabid as you want. But you don’t have a right to risk other people becoming rabid because you decided not to vaccinate your dog.

I.e., your right to endanger people stops at the end of your nose. You have a right (IMHO if not in law) to endanger yourself any way you want. But once your reckless behavior starts endangering others, that’s where your rights stop, and their rights begin.

But that seems to be a distinction that many Libertarian types don’t “get”. See, e.g., the Koch brothers, former candidates for the Libertarian Party, as they complain about laws requiring them to dispose of oil field wastes in an environmentally sound manner. People naturally don’t like being poisoned by other people’s wastes, and passed laws against that because the Koch Brothers’ right to engage in reckless behavior stops at the point where it endangers other people. Thus the Clean Water Act that keeps them from just dumping their wastes into the nearest stream or river where it can poison other people. But for some reason, Libertopians never seem to “get” that their rights stop at the point where their reckless behavior starts endangering others… it’s as if there’s a massive blind spot in their thought processes where only they, not other people, have rights.

We have a word for people who lack empathy for others and don’t consider others to be real like them: psychopath. Just sayin’.

– Badtux the Helpful Penguin

Read Full Post »

There’s two rules to live by that result in a better society for everybody:

1) Mind your own business.
2) Your right to do whatever you want to do ends at somebody else’s nose.

On #1, that’s why I don’t care about gay marriage, birth control, or a myriad of other things. Because as long as it doesn’t hurt me or mine (and I have an expansive view of the word “mine”, as in, everybody I know, or could know), it’s none of my business. And none of my government’s business, for that matter.

So far, so good. Capital-L Libertarians have the same view of #1 that civil libertarians have. Where we have a problem is that capital-L Libertarians then seem to say that we should not have all those laws that are about #2 — laws making it illegal to harm other people. They say we should be able to have contracts that allow harm if it’s between consenting adults, for example, if you want to run a coal mine that’s dangerous, well, it’s a contract between yourself and those consenting adults who hired on, you told them it was a dangerous mine, so that’s that.

But my take on it is that your right to run a dangerous coal mine stops at the point where it endangers other people, period, contract or no contract. It may seem to some Koch-suckers that it’s impossible for those two to coexist, that you cannot have #1 and #2 at the same time, that if you are going to have #1 allowing companies to engage in any business practices they want to engage in, you cannot have #2, which does not allow companies to engage in business practices that hurt people, but that’s just ridiculous. These basic principles are the fundamental principles upon which all modern democracies are based — that is, people are free to conduct their business in any manner they wish, unless it violates a law constructed to prevent harm to other people.

But of course the whole point of the Kochites saying that #2 isn’t viable is that it’s *profitable* to hurt other people. Properly disposing of oil well drilling fluids is expensive. Dumping them into someone else’s drinking water is cheap. And other people be damned, they want their profits, and more of it. Thus their attack on rule #2 of how we create a civilized society… and the difference between a civil libertarian, and a Kotch-style capital-L Libertarian.

– Badtux the Civil Liberties Penguin
[

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »