Apparently two different porn stars were paid by Trump or Trump surrogates to not talk about how they’d had sex with Donald Trump. While he was married. To people not them.
Here’s my take on that: What self-respecting porn star would even admit to having sex with Donald Trump?! Talk about free money!
Meanwhile, Trump’s deranged interview with the Wall Street Journal is getting no traction. Because dumpster fire. Who pays attention to stuff like that, when there’s a dumpster fire to watch?!
– Badtux the Head-shakin’ Penguin
As far as porn goes, there’s a certain audience segment that gets off from watching activities that would revolt vanillAmericans. The viewers are mostly vanillas themselves who enjoy seeing things they’d never do in real life. Or so I’ve read. Not that I’d know anything about that personally! For enough money, one can always find porn actwhores and actwhoresses who’ll do it. In this case, the big payoff came AFTER performing the alleged acts, eh?
As much as I despise President* Shithole, though, I don’t believe he had sexual intercourse with those women. At least not in the way Bill Clinton denied. There’s been enough written about Twitler’s phobias of germs that it seems legit. For that reason I doubt he’d dip his tiny stick into any strange, even if it was wrapped. Ditto with even kissing the pornchicks. The one whose photo I saw DOES resemble the Trumpulusconi template, though — fading MILFy blonde with big tits. Like all three of the ones he married. I could see him ogling that one if she did a strip tease for him, maybe getting the kind of nonsexualrelations that President Bill DID get from Monica. As long as his vienna sausage stayed encased, for protection against mouthgerms. And also so he would not leave any DNAvidence on a blue dress.
And face it, snarking aside, lots of degraded women would throw themselves at someone who was famous from TV. Fame has a magnetic attraction to too many people. If they can rub up against it, literally, they can hope that some of the lustrous lucre rubs off on them. After they’ve scrubbed themselves down with carbolic acid solution…
Re: the WSJ interview — Charles Pierce had a spit-take on that. It sounds like rambling babbling. If a recording of the stumbling bloviating was released, it would come across to me, you and any rational listener as the word salad of someone in early stage dementia. To a personality cultrumper, though, it would sound just fine. Because those fcukers are dementing themselves. Which is why I say screw them and their brain-dead opinions. Nobody cares what the homeless piss-stinky schizophrenic at the end of the bus is ranting about. We should have the same regard for trumpfuckwitz.
Edited to add — I see your second linky is to Pierce. I shoulda checked before I commented. Pierce is all I need to read to know what I need about Amerikan politics. I mean, I read MORE than him, most days. But if I get too busy to squizz other sources, I can rest easy knowing that I’ve got the good stuff if I’m up to date with him.
The transcript reads like the rantings of one of the denizens of Bus 22 here in the South SF Bay area. Otherwise known as the Hotel 22, because do-gooders get bus passes for the homeless, and because Bus 22 runs 24/7, the homeless just jump on the bus, get off at the other end, jump back on the bus when the doors open again, get off at the *other* end, wash, rinse, repeat. (Except without the wash part — unwashed sort of comes standard with this flavor of homeless loon).
I came home from the airport on Bus 22 last Saturday at around 11:45PM (because as much money as I’d spent flying to Loserana and back, fuck spending $40 more for a taxi when spending $2.25 gets me home just fine, albeit with some olfactory enhancement). The mentally ill denizens of Bus 22 sounded more coherent than Twitler.
– Badtux the “We are so fucked” Penguin
When you are near stinky people, the trick is to breathe shallowly through your mouth, not your nose. There are no scent receptors in the mouth. I’m not talking deep, lung-expanding mouth-breaths; just enough to keep you oxygenated until you can surface for clear air. That’s how I’ve been able to deal with cleaning faecally (as it’s spelt here) incontinent patients for years without gagging. Even during c. difficile outbreaks. Bothers me not!
Of course, pretty much every nurse and aide I’ve told this to over the decades has replied “Eeeew, I’d be inhaling airborne shit!” So nobody takes my advice. FWIW, I have never suffered any health consequences from this tactic. Maybe it helps that I never get sick. I have an amazing immune system, IMHO. Two times in Florida I came down with norovirus during nursing home outbreaks, despite scrupulous handwashing. But that’s because when there’s a critical mass of patients who are squirting diarrhoea like fountains, there are enough viral particles to aerosolise. Otherwise, it can be GOOD to be a mouth-breather. Even if you’re not a dumbfuck Republikkkan.
Given that I was recovering from a cold, the odor on Bus 22 wasn’t an issue. I couldn’t smell anything anyhow.
Trump appeared in a couple of soft porn movies back in the day, fully clothed thankfully. See link above. It wouldn’t surprise me if he sampled the talent. That’s just the sort of thing he’d do, and the talent would have been told, “this rich asshole is paying for this porno, bang him and move on.” I mean, you’re already being paid to be fucked. What’s one more rich asshole when you’re already being paid for it?
The woman in question signed the denial under her nom de porn, not her real name. would this make a difference legally?
In short: Not really. What matters is whether she reached an agreement freely and not under duress, not what name she put on the paper. If she was doing business under that name, and it’s clear that it was her, then that’s all the court cares about.